Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment
Kansas City Police Department / Police Foundation · Kansas City, USA · 1972
Summary
For decades, the dominant assumption in policing was that more patrol cars on streets reduced crime and made residents feel safer. This landmark RCT tested that assumption directly by randomly assigning patrol beats to receive no proactive patrol, standard patrol, or dramatically increased patrol. No meaningful differences emerged on crime rates, citizen fear, or satisfaction. The null result fundamentally changed the theory of patrol in policing and is among the most cited criminal justice experiments in history.
Research question
"Does increasing routine police patrol levels reduce crime rates?"
Methodology
Intervention
Three conditions: no patrol (reactive only), normal patrol (control), doubled/tripled patrol
Assignment
Randomized controlled trial (patrol beat)
Sample size
15 matched patrol beats
Primary outcome
Crime rates; citizen fear of crime; citizen satisfaction with police
Effect estimate
No significant difference across conditions on any primary outcome
Decision
Findings challenged the dominant patrol model; redirected investment toward targeted and community policing strategies
Result
Null
No significant difference across conditions on any primary outcome
Evidence strength
Strong
Randomized controlled trial with large sample.
Replication status
Partially replicated
Institution
Kansas City Police Department / Police Foundation
Location
Kansas City, USA
Year
1972
Policy area
Public Safety
Mechanism
Targeting