Public SafetyTargetingNull

Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment

Kansas City Police Department / Police Foundation · Kansas City, USA · 1972

Summary

For decades, the dominant assumption in policing was that more patrol cars on streets reduced crime and made residents feel safer. This landmark RCT tested that assumption directly by randomly assigning patrol beats to receive no proactive patrol, standard patrol, or dramatically increased patrol. No meaningful differences emerged on crime rates, citizen fear, or satisfaction. The null result fundamentally changed the theory of patrol in policing and is among the most cited criminal justice experiments in history.

Research question

"Does increasing routine police patrol levels reduce crime rates?"

Methodology

Intervention

Three conditions: no patrol (reactive only), normal patrol (control), doubled/tripled patrol

Assignment

Randomized controlled trial (patrol beat)

Sample size

15 matched patrol beats

Primary outcome

Crime rates; citizen fear of crime; citizen satisfaction with police

Effect estimate

No significant difference across conditions on any primary outcome

Decision

Findings challenged the dominant patrol model; redirected investment toward targeted and community policing strategies

Result

Null

No significant difference across conditions on any primary outcome

Evidence strength

Strong

Randomized controlled trial with large sample.

Replication status

Partially replicated

Institution

Kansas City Police Department / Police Foundation

Location

Kansas City, USA

Year

1972

Policy area

Public Safety

Mechanism

Targeting