Energy & EnvironmentDefaultPositive

Green Investment Default in Retirement Plans

Nest (UK National Employment Savings Trust) · United Kingdom · 2020

Summary

Nest's change of the default investment option for 10 million UK workers to a responsible investment fund is perhaps the largest-scale application of default theory ever implemented. Nearly all enrolled workers remained in the default. The opt-out rate was below 2%. Returns were comparable to the prior balanced default. The experiment demonstrates that default choice architecture can redirect enormous capital flows at near-zero cost — and that stated preferences for sustainability expressed in surveys are not needed to produce sustainable investment behavior when defaults do the work.

Research question

"Does making a responsible investment fund the default option increase sustainable investment allocation without reducing returns?"

Methodology

Intervention

Nest changed default fund allocation for 10 million enrolled workers from balanced fund to responsible investment fund; opt-out available

Assignment

Pre-post with administrative data; near-universal take-up of default

Sample size

10 million enrolled workers

Primary outcome

Allocation to responsible investment; opt-out rate; fund performance

Effect estimate

95%+ of enrolled workers now in responsible investment default; opt-out rate <2%; comparable returns

Decision

Default maintained; UK government explored similar requirements for other pension providers

Result

Positive

95%+ of enrolled workers now in responsible investment default; opt-out rate <2%; comparable returns

Evidence strength

Limited

Observational or pre-post design; correlation not necessarily causal.

Replication status

Open for replication

Institution

Nest (UK National Employment Savings Trust)

Location

United Kingdom

Year

2020

Policy area

Energy & Environment

Mechanism

Default