Voter EngagementCommunity engagementPositive

Door-to-Door GOTV Canvassing — New Haven

Yale University (Green & Gerber) · New Haven, CT, USA · 2000

Summary

The New Haven canvassing experiment established one of the most durable findings in political science: personal contact substantially increases voter turnout, while impersonal contact (mail, phone) has little effect. The mechanism is human social connection — canvassers are neighbors and community members, not call-center operators. The size of the effect (5–9 pp) is large relative to most civic interventions and has been replicated across party contexts, candidate types, and countries. The experiment also established a key null: direct mail, despite its ubiquity in political campaigns, has no reliable effect on turnout. Money spent on mail could produce 6x more turnout if spent on canvassers.

Research question

"Does in-person door-to-door canvassing increase voter turnout compared to direct mail or phone contact?"

Methodology

Intervention

Registered nonvoters and sporadic voters randomly assigned to: (1) personal visit from trained canvasser with civic duty message, (2) direct mail with same message, (3) phone call with same message, (4) no contact. Canvassers visited multiple times if initial contact failed.

Assignment

Randomized controlled trial (individual)

Sample size

29,380 registered voters in New Haven; multiple replications totaling 100,000+

Primary outcome

Voter turnout in November 2000 general election (verified through official records)

Effect estimate

Personal canvassing: +6 to +9 pp; direct mail: +0 to +1 pp (not significant); phone calls: +3 pp. Effect of canvassing has been replicated in 50+ subsequent studies with consistent range of 5–10 pp.

Decision

Canvassing became standard in campaign strategy for competitive races; nonpartisan organizations (Obama campaigns, state Secretaries of State) adopted structured canvassing programs; finding replicated in US, UK, Canada, and multiple European countries

Result

Positive

Personal canvassing: +6 to +9 pp; direct mail: +0 to +1 pp (not significant); phone calls: +3 pp. Effect of canvassing has been replicated in 50+ subsequent studies with consistent range of 5–10 pp.

Evidence strength

Strong

Randomized trial, replicated across multiple sites or studies.

Replication status

Replicated

Institution

Yale University (Green & Gerber)

Location

New Haven, CT, USA

Year

2000

Policy area

Voter Engagement

Mechanism

Community engagement