International DevelopmentHuman capitalPositive

Primary School Deworming — Kenya

ICS / MIT Poverty Action Lab · Western Kenya · 1998

Summary

The Kenya deworming study found that mass treatment with a cheap, safe drug increased school participation substantially — and that the effects persisted into adulthood as higher earnings. The $3.50 cost per additional year of schooling made it one of the most cost-effective education interventions documented. The study became a cornerstone of evidence-based development and triggered a global scale-up. Subsequent reanalysis and replication have produced more modest estimates, and a Cochrane review found weaker evidence of general health benefits — but the cost-effectiveness case for deworming in high-prevalence areas remains strong.

Research question

"Does mass deworming treatment in primary schools improve attendance and learning outcomes?"

Methodology

Intervention

75 schools randomly assigned to receive deworming treatment (albendazole) annually for 2 years vs. delayed treatment control; treatment delivered through schools

Assignment

Randomized controlled trial (school-level)

Sample size

30,000+ students across 75 schools

Primary outcome

School participation; health outcomes; long-run earnings

Effect estimate

School participation: +7.5 percentage points; cost per additional year of schooling: $3.50; long-run earnings for treated cohort: +14% at age 20

Decision

Kenya national deworming program adopted; Evidence Action's Deworm the World Initiative reached 280 million children annually

Result

Positive

School participation: +7.5 percentage points; cost per additional year of schooling: $3.50; long-run earnings for treated cohort: +14% at age 20

Evidence strength

Strong

Randomized controlled trial with large sample.

Replication status

Partially replicated

Institution

ICS / MIT Poverty Action Lab

Location

Western Kenya

Year

1998

Policy area

International Development

Mechanism

Human capital